| Until a week ago I had never viewed
actual footage of Hunter S. Thompson but I’d seen photos:
a stony face and a cynical pair of eyes staring out from behind
purple shades, his shoulders draped with the Stars and Strips,
while the shelf behind is adorned with snake skulls and ox
skulls and a Bowie knife or two. I’d bought in into
the Great Hunter S. Myth. I imagined that the man himself
would be somewhat like the image that emerges from his psychedelically-charged
writings: a drunken stoned madman who has just enough insanity
to see and write the truth about the rise and, more importantly
the fall, of modern America. Perhaps he didn’t take
as many drugs in real-time as he did in narrative-time, but
I imagined him possessing the same free and energetic spirit
as his famous literary creation, Raoul Duke. So when I received
a brown paper parcel all the way from Basalt, Colorado, whose
contents turned out to be Wayne Ewing’s little-seen
documentary, Breakfast with Hunter I was all eyes
and ears. The title promised an intimate look into Thompson’s
life. Breakfast is about the most intimate meal you can have
with someone: it suggests you’ve either stayed overnight,
or arrived at a time when only family and friends would normally
appear. I imagined sitting there at the table with Thompson
drinking coffees or perhaps whiskeys, perhaps both, and catching
glimpses of what makes one of America’s most famous
cult writers tick.
The most interesting thing aspect of Ewing’s Breakfast
with Hunter, however, is that in trying to consciously
perpetuate the myth of Hunter S., Ewing manages to dispel
it. From the film’s first image which shows Thompson
pulling up to the Viper Room in a large convertible that reminded
me of the Great Red Shark that cruised through the pages of
Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, we get a sense of
a man who seems to be trying hard, too hard, to live up the
image he created of himself in his writings. Ewing makes a
half-hearted effort to generate a rough, on-the-spot, catch-the-craziness-as-it-happens
visual style, an effort which consists of little more than
swinging his camera wildly from one person to another in the
midst of conversations. But nothing Ewing does behind the
camera, and certainly none of Thompson’s self-conscious
antics in front of the camera, manage to dispel the sense
of a somewhat shallow deception. The Thompson we see sitting
on stage in the Viper Room with Johnny Depp, surrounded by
groups of devotees who shower him with praise, carrying around
a perennial glass of whiskey which never seems to be drunk,
and attempting to answer questions from audiences or simply
talking to others, is surprisingly inarticulate,
I would even say surprisingly empty of original ideas.
Perhaps he took more drugs than I thought -- he certainly
seems as though he would need a long runway to achieve takeoff,
to achieve the kind of energetic outpouring that is so characteristic
of his written work, a chaotic outpouring that prompted Bill
Cardoso of the Boston Sunday Globe to describe a
piece Thompson had written as, "...pure Gonzo!".
Cardoso borrowed this term for ‘the last man standing
after a drinking contest’ from South Boston Irish slang.
‘Gonzo’ described the man who drank more than
his comrades, the man who went further and didn’t pass
out, in short, the man who was left to tell the tale cause
he’d been there to witness every last bit of it. Perhaps
Thompson is such a man, or was such a man. Perhaps there are
two Thompson’s: one who existed in the past, and one
who remains in the present like one of those cast off shells
washed up on the beach that the living animal has long since
vacated. Or more likely, there is a Thompson that only emerges
in fiction, and that needs to be artificially constructed
and supported to exist in reality. Breakfast with Hunter
documents the strange sight of a fictitious being tying to
exist in the real world, and Thompson has the ungainly and
awkward appearance of a spaceman trying to move whilst encumbered
by the artificial environment of his suit. Perhaps we do occasionally
glimpse the real Thompson, as in a scene towards
the end of Breakfast with Hunter, where Thompson
is sitting in a hotel room surrounded by guests, and in a
rare, brief moment of silence, seems somewhat sad, dejected
and uncertain. Perhaps Breakfast with Hunter does,
in the end, offer us an intimate glimpse of Thompson even
if it is not the glimpse the Ewing wants us to see. And this
is what can make documentaries so fascinating to watch: in
attempting to document reality they often reveal that the
most they can achieve is an artificially-constructed representation.
And in attempting to construct a particular representation
of reality they often reveal that through the cracks, as it
were, another representation, which they neither selected
nor wished for, seeps in. After Breakfast with Hunter
I sat down and re-watched Terry Gilliam’s film version
of Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas (1998) with its
hallucinatory visual style composed of swirling camera movements,
bright lights, off-kilter colour schemes, and a Las Vegas
that seems a kind of lucid rubbery dreamland. I never realized
before just how closely Johnny Deep had observed Hunter S.
Thompson’s mannerisms and how deftly he imitated them.
And in the end, the Strange and Terrible truth that came swooping
and screeching and diving down upon me like one those goddamn
bats with razor sharp claws was that Johnny Depp played Thompson
better than Thompson played himself.
Postscript: When I finished writing this review I went
out to a press screening. I returned home to hear on the late
night news that Hunter S. Thompson had died from what they
called, in the carefully-chosen ever-diplomatic non-committal
language of Australian news reportage, "a self-inflicted
gunshot wound". It made me reflect on Thompson, not just
as I’d seen him in Breakfast with Hunter, but
beyond the bounds of that documentary. Whatever Hunter S.
Thompson was or was not in his own life, he was one
hell of a writer. He could write himself into a place
that was somewhere between decadence and profundity, and when
he did it was, as Bill Cardoso noted all those years ago,
"pure Gonzo"
To buy this film click here.
|